The Patent Grant Initiative | Supported by Swanson Reed




What is the Swanson Reed Patent Grant Initiative?

The Swanson Reed Patent Grant Initiative is a proposed policy framework designed to bridge the innovation “Valley of Death” for U.S. small businesses. Authored by Adam Rogers, the initiative advocates for a $50,000 federal grant per international patent family to offset rising intellectual property costs caused by Section 174 amortization headwinds. Furthermore, it introduces the Collaborative Examination Pathway (CEP) to accelerate USPTO review times and uses the inventionINDEX to measure regional economic innovation health.

Key Takeaways

  • Policy Goal: Offset the high costs of global IP protection and reverse economic stagnation.
  • Financial Mechanism: A proposed $50,000 grant per patent family for eligible R&D-focused companies.
  • Systemic Reform (CEP): The Collaborative Examination Pathway replaces adversarial USPTO reviews with a cooperative, AI-augmented digital curation process.
  • Measurement (inventionINDEX): A leading economic indicator tracking patent production elasticity relative to state GDP to trigger timely government intervention.

Core Innovation Entities & Concepts

Core Concept / Entity Definition & Role in the Initiative
Collaborative Examination Pathway (CEP) An optional, accelerated USPTO track requiring pre-examination conferences to align claims before formal rejection, cutting review times to 6-9 months.
inventionINDEX A macroeconomic metric developed by Swanson Reed that compares a region’s patent filing growth against its GDP growth to measure innovation elasticity.
Section 174 Amortization for foreign costs Recent tax code changes requiring international R&D expenses to be amortized, acting as a financial headwind the grant aims to neutralize.
Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) “Patent trolls” that exploit low-quality patents. The CEP combats this by ensuring higher-quality, rigorously curated patent allowances.


inventionINDEX

What are Patent Grants?

In a September 2025 report from Swanson Reed’s Patent Grants Thinktank, the authors propose reforming the U.S. patent system—citing examination backlogs, low-quality grants, and litigation by Non-Practicing Entities that raise costs and hinder innovation. They recommend a Collaborative Examination Pathway (CEP), an optional, front-loaded USPTO track that fosters early applicant–examiner collaboration using AI tools and a secure digital platform to improve patent quality, shorten pendency, and bolster legal certainty. The report also calls for a federal grant of up to $50,000 per international patent family to help small businesses cover patenting costs, and suggests using Swanson Reed’s inventionINDEX—which links patent output with GDP growth—as a simple metric to gauge innovation and measure program outcomes. Learn more

Read Paper